Since content is drawn from external sources, AI summarization, and the user s own angle, how does PurePuls.ai handle attribution, copyright, and plagiarism risks?
PurePuls.ai ensures full transparency: the original articles used to generate each Pulse are readily accessible to the user, complete with links and metadata. This allows users to consult the source directly and properly attribute rights when posting a Pulse on their own networks. By combining AI summarization with the user s personal angle, the platform minimizes direct copying while keeping content ethical, credible, and safe to share also giving users confidence in both quality and legal compliance.

What kind of sources does PurePuls.ai draw from? Are they credible, diverse, up to-date, and relevant to the user s audience?
If the AI scans thousands of articles every day, what filters are applied to ensure quality over noise or clickbait?
PurePuls.ai draws information from a wide range of reputable and diverse sources, spanning traditional media outlets to specialized platforms in science, technology, and business. Among its sources are BBC, The Guardian, Financial Times, Bloomberg, as well as French-language media like Le Nouvel Obs and the S nat.

But the AI isn t limited to major news outlets: it also taps into community platforms like specialized sites such as TechCrunch, MIT Technology Review, or Science, and even organizations and NGOs like WWF or Greenpeace. This mix ensures a flow of information that is reliable, relevant, and up-to-date, covering a wide array of topics: international news, economy, tech, science, environment, education, and innovation.

To filter out noise or potentially low-quality content, users have full control to boost or deboost any source across their personas. This provides a first level of personalized filtering, giving priority to the sources selected by the user themselves. This way, each Pulse delivered aligns with the user s preferences and ensures quality over clickbait.