Forums
Opening ARVO beta this week: Lifetime free access for first 100 users
Hey Product Hunt!
After 6 months of solo building, ARVO is ready for beta testing.
ARVO - AI coach that adapts your workout set-by-set in real-time
Your AI workout coach that adapts in real-time. Suggests weight and reps based on your previous set. Explains WHY behind every decision. Like a personal trainer in your pocket, but FREE (join beta program) vs $150/session
AI Team Orchestrator - Multi-agent orchestration framework with 94% lower API costs
Open-source framework that runs AI agents as a coordinated team. Features Director-led orchestration, workspace memory, automatic handoffs, and conditional quality gates. Includes 62K-word implementation guide documenting real failures and solutions.
Building real multi-agent AI: 5 lessons from the trenches (+ questions for you)
I built a multi-agent orchestration system and turned the dev exhaust (tests, Git commits, CLI docs) into a free ebook. It s not theory: it documents the architecture, failures, refactors and ops decisions that made it production-ready. 5 lessons that actually moved the needle 1. Architecture > prompts. The wins came from memory, quality gates, orchestration, and service layers not better prompts . 2. Hire teams dynamically. A Recruiter AI assembles the right agent team per goal/domain; hard-coding roles doesn t scale. 3. Unify orchestration. Consolidating multiple orchestrators into a Unified Orchestrator cut conflicts and latency, and improved completion rates. 4. Production readiness is a discipline. We built a Production Readiness Audit to stress security, scalability, and performance beyond it works on dev . 5. Load reveals truth. A load-testing shock forced pragmatic quality thresholds and better prioritization systems get smarter under stress. Questions for the community How are you deciding when to use structured vs adaptive orchestration at runtime? What s your bar for quality gates so you don t stall progress? Would you find more useful: a starter repo + checklists, or deeper chapters on monitoring/telemetry & cost control? Link (free beta): books.danielepelleri.com P.S. The ebook was compiled automatically from the project s tests, commits, and CLI-generated docs so the narrative mirrors the real workflow, not a cleaned-up case study.
Built a multi-agent AI system — and had AI write the book about it
TL;DR
I built a multi-agent AI orchestration system and let AI generate an ebook from real tests, Git commits, and CLI-generated docs. Free, practical, and very in the trenches . What it is
AI Team Orchestrator an AI-generated captain s log of the build: architecture, failures, fixes, and lessons learned. Why it s different
Not theory. It s compiled from the actual dev exhaust (tests/commits/docs), so the narrative mirrors the real workflow. Who it s for
Builders shipping with agents, founders validating AI ops, and devs curious about orchestration beyond toy demos. Link
books.danielepelleri.com Ask (feedback welcome!) 1. Which chapter needs the most depth (architecture, evals, guardrails, ops)? 2. Would a starter repo + checklists be more useful than more chapters? 3. What s missing to apply this in a real startup stack? Self-promo, yes but I m genuinely looking for critique and use-cases. Happy to share the raw prompts/pipeline if helpful.

