Daniel

Hey All
I built Coruve as a side project because I was tired of essentially being my own analyst.
My setup was the same one most founders have: GA4, Clarity (which needs a consent banner), the Stripe dashboard (revenue, with no idea which channel it came from), and a spreadsheet stapling it all together. Four tools and not one of them ever answered the only question I actually had: what changed this week, and what should I do about it?
Two things convinced me to build it properly:
1. Your fastest-growing traffic source is invisible. AI traffic passed human traffic this year (57.5% of requests, per Cloudflare), and roughly 70% of ChatGPT/Perplexity/Claude referrals land in GA4 as "direct." Coruve classifies every event as human / AI agent / crawler at ingest, so AI sources sit next to every other channel including how much revenue they bring.
2. Analytics tools show you charts and leave the analysis to you. Coruve does the analysis. Statistics engines detect anomalies and run contribution analysis to rank likely causes; an LLM only narrates the result. Numbers from engines, words from models so a finding can't hallucinate a number at you. And every finding ships with the button to act on it: create the alert, save the segment, track the funnel.
Some things I deliberately did NOT build:
No session replay. It's a GDPR minefield and Microsoft gives it away free. You get aggregate click and scroll maps plus frustration signals (rage clicks, dead clicks, quick-backs) instead same insight, no consent banner, because there's no recording to consent to.
No query language, no mandatory instrumentation, no per-seat pricing.
Free tier is 10k events/month, no card. Paid starts at $19/mo.
The feedback I'm actually looking for: install it and tell me whether your first week of findings is useful or noise. That's the whole bet of the product, and I'd rather hear it bluntly than politely. I'm in the comments all day.