We re launching YunCMS on September 14. It s an open-source, self-hosted MySQL CMS/backend that grew out of watching teams rebuild authentication, permissions, CRUD, file handling and extension plumbing across projects. Now AI tools also need to work with those systems without bypassing permissions. Before you trust a new self-hosted backend, what do you test first? My current shortlist: a backup and restore flow you have actually tested field- and row-level permissions, including the Public role session and API-token behavior behind a reverse proxy file-storage recovery a predictable, pinned update path AI and MCP access constrained by the same RBAC as human users YunCMS is still in the 0.1.x pre-stable line, so this is exactly the kind of feedback we want before claiming maturity. What would you add to the list, and which item has caused the most pain in a real deployment?
YunCMS is an open-source, self-hosted MySQL CMS/backend for teams that want schema-driven content APIs without rebuilding auth, permissions and file handling. It combines a React Studio, REST API, field- and row-level RBAC, local/S3 files, extensions, and backup/update tooling. Run it with npm or the official multi-platform Docker Compose stack. Optional AI and MCP integrations operate under the signed-in user's existing permissions. The 0.1.x line is pre-stable.
Novasis AI unifies CRM, project management and finance operations in one panel. Create records with chat or voice commands and manage teams with role-based permissions.
