That's the most common assumption, and it's fair to ask given how many "AI baby tracker" apps have shown up recently. Here's the actual distinction: WHO/CDC lists, App (and most apps built on top of them) give every child the same expected range based purely on chronological age. That works fine for the "average" child, but it breaks down fast for the roughly 1 in 10 babies born preterm, kids with medical conditions, or anyone whose development doesn't track a clean average.
Minimiles starts from a different input: your child's actual medical and developmental history - gestational age, relevant conditions, prior checkups - and adjusts what "on track" means specifically for them. So instead of "your baby should be crawling by 9 months," a parent of a baby born at 32 weeks gets guidance adjusted for corrected age and their specific developmental context. The AI is doing personalization on top of a real clinical framework.
