I built Climb because I kept running into the same problem comparing job offers: two offers can show the exact same "total comp" number on paper and pay out completely differently in reality, depending on how the RSU grant vests. A backloaded schedule and an even one look identical on a summary line, but one of them leaves you underpaid for two years.
Climb lets you enter base, bonus, RSU grant, and vesting schedule (common presets or fully custom) for up to 3 offers side by side, then plots cumulative earned value year over year instead of just totaling it up. It also shows what you'd walk away with if you left after year 1 the number most comparisons skip entirely.
No signup, single page, free to use.
Genuinely here all day ask me anything about the assumptions behind the model, and if something looks off (especially the vesting math or growth rate handling), I want to know.
Most offer comparisons show total comp, but that hides when the money shows up. Climb lets you enter base, bonus, RSU grant, and vesting schedule (presets or custom) for up to 3 offers, then charts cumulative earned value year over year — so you see the cliff, not just a number. Also shows walk-away value if you leave after year 1. No signup, single page. Feedback on the vesting math welcome.
