Brian Shih

@amol this looks really nice - can you tell us what the permissions are required for? The "read and change all data on websites you visit" bit is a bit scary.

Upends some of the traditional incremental game models - you need to sacrifice higher tier things to make lower tier things more efficiently, but higher tier things also produce lower tier things automatically.

Anyone know how this compares to Gamemaker? They both feel similar in terms of pricing / feature set (although Gamemaker runs on Windows only for the latest version).

I'm also curious how this compares to do.com if anyone has used both of them.

Landing pages that don't contain anything except for a vague tagline and a sign-up flow need to die. There are too many new products to try out there (as this site clearly shows) - don't make me hunt and justify to myself why I should sign up for yours.

I'd love to see a digital app version of these too - Jesse Schell's game design deck has an app ("AGD Lenses") that makes it easy to always have it available.

Not sure which came first, but 1024 looks a lot like Threes which has been pretty popular on iOS lately: https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/threes!/id779157948?mt=8 Some of the comments claim it's a knockoff of Threes, and judging by the art style similarity, seems reasonable.

Hi @iamkoby! How do you guys compare yourselves to airenvy (also featured here awhile back)?

The end of blue links. How will we ever know where to click? ;)

It's also available on iOS if you jailbreak.

Despite the "x for y" cliche, this does look like Aardvark for mobile. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aardvark_(search_engine)