Hi, I'm working on a product that allows companies to sponsor open source projects. It's different from GitHub sponsors, Patreon, etc in that the developer: 1. Puts a link in their readme
2. Approves sponsors messages 3. The sponsorship message shows up to users (sponsors pay based on CPM) In short, it's an extremely curated ad network that still gives the open-source developer full control over who and what is displayed on their readme, but allows them to monetize their open-source project. Companies prefer this way because they can reach a developer audience while supporting the project directly. Questions: 1. As a *consumer* of open source, would it bother you to see an unobtrusive "sponsored by" image in the README? 2. As an open-source developer, what objections do you have to using something like this?
I m a a B2B marketer and an angel/seed investor specializing in healthcare SaaS. I m principal @ T. Nugent & Associates (www.tnugentassociates.com) and co-founder of Ventures Next (www.venturesnext.com). Ask me anything about B2B marketing from startup phase to Fortune 50, or my perspective as an investor.
Do you love doing more work than you need to? We love it too! Which is why you should NOT buy this awesome full stack starter kit for your next project. - Whats Done for you? Passwordless Authentication, Stripe Integration, API documentation, and more!
Data scientists and machine learning engineers are expensive. Why not try a fixed price service from experts who have built hundreds of machine learning models?
All Hands is the easiest way to outsource small tasks right from Slack. Outsourcing is broken. It's often more work to outsource small scopes than it is to just do them yourself. With our Slack bot, you can request, and manage the task without leaving Slack.
