We're introducing Provenant by IdentiQube for teams putting AI agents to work across business systems. An agent's ability to call a tool should not be its permission to use that tool for any purpose. Provenant evaluates routed actions against explicit mandates and policies: allow, deny, or hold for human approval, with a reason and a tamper-evident audit record. Budgets add another control for actions with a declared value. You can integrate authorization into your application or route execution through the gateway, which holds the downstream credential. Gateway enforcement depends on keeping independent credentials outside the agent runtime and using a trusted integration to describe the action accurately. There is a Free tier and paid plans. The SDKs and examples are Apache-2.0; the control plane is commercially licensed. What action would you want an agent to handle, and where would you require approval? We can help work through an integration in writing here or at provenant@identiqube.com. Documentation: https://provenant.identiqube.com... Examples: https://github.com/IdentiQube/Pr...

Forum Threads

p/provenant-by-identiqube

•

17h ago

Where do you draw the line on what an AI agent can do?

An agent can have valid credentials and still take an action you never intended: send a message, change a customer record, or modify infrastructure.

We re launching Provenant by IdentiQube tomorrow to help teams make those boundaries explicit. Define an agent s mandate, apply policies, require human approval where needed, and retain a tamper-evident record of decisions. Actions routed through the execution gateway are checked before the downstream service is called.

View all

Provenant by IdentiQube

Control what your AI agents are allowed to do

Control what your AI agents are allowed to do

Forum Threads

Where do you draw the line on what an AI agent can do?

Forum Threads

Where do you draw the line on what an AI agent can do?