Reviewers are overwhelmingly positive, though the evidence is sparse. The clearest user feedback calls Gemini 2.5 an extremely good model and praises the lack of usage limits in AI Studio. Founder feedback adds specific, practical strengths: the makers of
Atoms cite strong multimodal and web-scale understanding for research,
SocialEcho 2.0 points to multilingual performance and cost efficiency, and
StoreClaw uses it for image and video generation. No meaningful criticisms appear in the reviews provided.
Hey Hunters! 🚀
Introducing Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental – Google's latest leap in AI reasoning and coding capabilities! 🧠💡 With top-tier performance on LMArena, GPQA, and AIME 2025, this model sets a new benchmark for tackling complex tasks.
How do you see Gemini 2.5 shaping the future of AI-powered problem-solving? Let’s discuss! 🔥👇
@saaswarrior This is a big step forward for AI. Excited to see how Gemini 2.5 transforms problem-solving. Wishing you a great launch!
Though I am impressed with what the 2.5 Pro accomplishes now, I really was surprised to see how the words have been framed to confuse the users as they try to close the compare windows. The pop-up had a title "Close" and content said "Closing the chat will lose the data. Do you want to continue?" with CTAs "Cancel' and "Continue". It can rather be simplified and straight forward as "Closing the chat will lose the data. Do you want to close?", the CTAs can be "No, go back" and "Yes, close".
Hope to see minor and simple updates fixed sooner for a better user experience :)
DiffSense
I'm trying to get cursor to add this model "gemini-2.5-pro-exp-03-25" https://github.com/getcursor/cursor/issues/2926 any 👍 on the issue would be 👌
Not many know this. But googles models are mostly free to use. Some rate limits, but for normal use. It's free. Via https://aistudio.google.com
Exceptional improvements for tech tasks! Can't wait to try! 👍