Hi, I'm Angel, a software engineer who builds GenAI platforms for a living. In distributed systems a retry is only safe if the operation is idempotent. When I looked at putting AI agents on top of UiPath and SAP automations, nothing in the sources said which ones were. So I built this, alone, as a side project.

FlowGlyph reads the files your automations are made of (UiPath XAML, SAP OData $metadata, iFlows, BPMN, n8n, OpenAPI) with parsers, not with AI, and turns every workflow into a typed function: inputs, outputs, what it changes in the world, and whether running it twice is safe.

From that one catalog you take what you need:

a retry-safety report you can hand to an auditor
a wiki an LLM keeps up to date without erasing your notes
context files so your coding agent stops guessing
an MCP gateway that lets AI agents run your automations with a policy, approvals and an audit log
a planner that designs a workflow from the client's Word document and marks what does not exist instead of inventing it

Try it in a minute:

pip install "flowglyph[cli]"

flowglyph idempotency https://github.com/UiPath/ReFrameWork --kind workflow

One row tells you that GetTransactionData is not safe to run twice.

It is open source (Apache-2.0) and alpha: the adapters have seen vendor templates and synthetic projects, not a real client estate yet.

What I am looking for today is not votes but your use case: which automation would you point it at, and what should it read next?