We spent most of 2025 watching teams try to 'prompt' their way out of agentic hallucinations. It doesn't work. If you give an LLM-based agent access to a production database or a shell, you are always one 'ignore previous instructions' jailbreak away from a catastrophic incident. We believe Faramesh is the first project to treat the 'Agent-to-System' bridge as a distributed systems problem rather than a prompting problem. The hardest part to get right was the Deterministic Canonicalization. LLMs are inherently messy, one model might send {"power": 100.0} while another sends {"power": 100} for the same tool call. To build a reliable Action Authorization Boundary (AAB), we had to ensure that the semantic intent produces a stable, cryptographic hash every single time. Without this, you cannot have reliable RBAC, audit trails, or 'fail-closed' security for autonomous agents. We’ve open-sourced the core logic today and would love for the community to tear apart our approach in canonicalization.py. We’re specifically interested in whether people think this architecture could eventually be standardized into a formal 'Agentic Firewall' protocol.

Faramesh

Establishing the Standard for Agentic Execution Control

Establishing the Standard for Agentic Execution Control