Carbon reporting becomes difficult when a final number cannot be traced back to its source, calculation method and review history. We built CarbonSight to give reporting and sustainability teams a clearer MRV workflow. It connects source data, approved calculation methods, exceptions, human reviews and supporting evidence, so each figure can be checked properly. When information is missing or inconsistent, CarbonSight flags it for review instead of silently filling the gap. It prepares the evidence needed for reporting and assurance, while the final assurance opinion remains with the appointed assurer. We would appreciate feedback from sustainability, reporting, assurance and operations teams. Which part of your carbon-reporting process currently requires the most manual work?

Carbonsight

Carbon evidence that can survive review

Carbon evidence that can survive review