Launching today

ATS Score
See in 10 seconds whether a robot can read your resume
2 followers
See in 10 seconds whether a robot can read your resume
2 followers
Upload your resume and get an ATS score in 10 seconds, plus missing keywords and your three worst problems. Free, no signup, no email. The free scan runs entirely in your browser: the file never leaves your device. The full 21-check report is $9.99 once, or $19.99 with a rewrite targeted at your job. No subscription, nothing renews. We do not print the “75% of resumes are rejected by ATS” statistic. It traces to a 2012 sales pitch that never published a method.




Free Options
Launch Team

Render: Get up to $100K in startup creditsThe fastest way to deploy and scale apps and agents
Promoted
Every resume tool I looked at opens with the same number: "75% of resumes are rejected by ATS". I went looking for the source. It traces back to a 2012 sales presentation by a resume optimisation company that shut down the following year and never published a methodology. RezScore tested about 5,000 resumes in 2026 and found 93% parsed cleanly.
So I built this the opposite way. It only reports problems that are provably there, and it won't print a scary number to make the results feel urgent.
Two other choices worth explaining:
1. Scoring is 21 deterministic rules, not an LLM. The same resume returns exactly the same score every time. A model only touches the paid rewrite step — and it never invents experience for you. Anything you have to supply yourself comes back in square brackets.
2. Pricing is one-time, not monthly. A job search usually lasts a few weeks, and paying a subscription for three weeks of use is the complaint people repeat most about the existing tools.
What it does not do: no resume builder, no job tracker, no browser extension, no LinkedIn integration. If you need those, the existing tools have them and I don't.
Free tier is unlimited and needs no account.
One question I'd genuinely like answered: which of the 21 checks do you think is wrong? The one we argue about internally is "every bullet must start with a verb" — that's a readability heuristic, not something any AI actually checks.