My background is security and penetration testing. The job is adversarial: you assume a system is broken and you try to break it before a real attacker does. You work through every way it can fail, then rank those risks by how much damage they'd do and how likely they are.
When I watched how organizations make their biggest decisions, that instinct was nowhere to be found. A company approves an expensive initiative off a convincing presentation, or picks a direction because the most senior person in the room preferred it, and nobody stress-tests the plan until one of the failure modes is already happening. Months of work, real budget, committed to a decision no one actually attacked. The attacker's seat at the table was empty.
That's the seat I built. Argumont is enterprise decision infrastructure. You bring a real decision into a Decision Room. Each serious option gets an advocate, then a set of specialized challengers goes to work: they attack the reasoning, check whether the evidence holds, hunt for the failure mode everyone missed, and try to break the plan with realistic scenarios. What survives becomes a Verdict you can inspect: what won, why the others lost, what evidence mattered, what risk is left, and what would change the call. When the evidence isn't enough, it says so instead of manufacturing a winner.
The final decision stays with you. Argumont keeps the analysis, the disagreements, the evidence, and the reasoning, so the decision can be reopened when circumstances change.
Try it at argumont.com. Bring a decision you're actually stuck on and put it through the room.
Hi Product Hunt! I'm the founder of Argumont.
My background is security and penetration testing. The job is adversarial: you assume a system is broken and you try to break it before a real attacker does. You work through every way it can fail, then rank those risks by how much damage they'd do and how likely they are.
When I watched how organizations make their biggest decisions, that instinct was nowhere to be found. A company approves an expensive initiative off a convincing presentation, or picks a direction because the most senior person in the room preferred it, and nobody stress-tests the plan until one of the failure modes is already happening. Months of work, real budget, committed to a decision no one actually attacked. The attacker's seat at the table was empty.
That's the seat I built. Argumont is enterprise decision infrastructure. You bring a real decision into a Decision Room. Each serious option gets an advocate, then a set of specialized challengers goes to work: they attack the reasoning, check whether the evidence holds, hunt for the failure mode everyone missed, and try to break the plan with realistic scenarios. What survives becomes a Verdict you can inspect: what won, why the others lost, what evidence mattered, what risk is left, and what would change the call. When the evidence isn't enough, it says so instead of manufacturing a winner.
The final decision stays with you. Argumont keeps the analysis, the disagreements, the evidence, and the reasoning, so the decision can be reopened when circumstances change.
Try it at argumont.com. Bring a decision you're actually stuck on and put it through the room.