Hi Product Hunt! I’m Seongwoo, the maker of AewolFlow. I’m building AewolFlow around a question: how do we keep the connection between what we read, what the evidence supports, and what we eventually write? Start with a research question, choose your papers, and compare their methods, findings, and limitations. Supporting quotations stay beside the comparison so you can return to the original text. When evidence is unavailable, the comparison leaves that gap visible. You can try one private project and one comparison of 2–3 arXiv papers free, with no card required. Pro adds literature reviews, drafting from selected evidence, PDF reading, and connections to Claude, Codex, and Cursor. AI can still misinterpret a paper. The aim is to make checking its work easier. I’d love you to try it with a question you’re actually researching. Where does your literature-review workflow get stuck today?

AewolFlow

AI literature reviews with evidence you can inspect

AI literature reviews with evidence you can inspect