From a marketing perspective:
- Association with Wikipedia is a strong selling point
- The name probably should change. "WT" itself doesn't really roll off the tongue. Also not sure it's a good idea to have -> : in their name.
Just one person's opinion though 🤷🏽♂️
I’ve been enjoying the emails. I suspect that with mindful curation on my part this will continue to be useful for me.
The pain point as I see it is that we’ve all become accustomed to seeking out bigger numbers on social networks and I’m not convinced that this will offer as much value that way so I’m keeping mine selective and trying to use it as a focused tool to deliver targeted news.
Overall, it’s been about a week and I like it.
This explains why you might be seeing a paywall. Its only for early adopters since they moved to a new platform. https://www.wikitribune.com/wt/n...
Report
it does not accept my password when registering. Your password is not strong enough! I tried all the combinations
Report
Honestly, the UI needs to be worked on properly. Secondly, I found it a bit difficult to navigate freely, hope future updates makes it more seamless.
Report
The community has already adopted the "silence all those with a dissenting opinion from the groupthink", as seen on Wikipedia. And the founder of WT.Social is simply pocketing any donated revenues... no sign of applying it toward site improvements or paying staff who may know what they're doing, more than the founder. It's just a trainwreck in very, very slow motion.
1Degree
Cuely AI