Launched this week
PersonWise
Create AI courses learners can talk to and embed anywhere
12 followers
Create AI courses learners can talk to and embed anywhere
12 followers
Published content is one-way: people watch or read, then leave with their questions unasked. PersonWise creates interactive courses your audience can talk to: designer-grade slides, a digital-human presenter, real-time voice Q&A grounded in your content, and assessment. Onboard a team, teach a class, or give the fans on your site a lore guide they can question. Publish by link or embed it anywhere as a YouTube-like player. Topic to complete course in as little as 15 minutes, in 9 languages.
how does the digital-human presenter actually handle it when someone asks something that's not covered in the source material — does it deflect or try to improvise?
@cihan928096 Good question. The default behavior is somewhere between those two: it first checks the current slide, relevant parts of the rest of the course, and any attached source material. If the answer still isn't there, it can give a brief general-knowledge answer, but it should make clear that it is going beyond the course and never pretend the information came from the source. There is also a stricter materials-only mode for cases where outside knowledge is not acceptable. I chose that split because always deflecting can make ordinary learning frustrating, while silent improvisation is risky.
How does the real-time voice Q&A actually stay accurate when people ask things that go beyond what's in the source material you uploaded?
@selim380478 That's an important boundary. PersonWise checks the current slide, the rest of the course, and the uploaded material first. If the default mode answers from general knowledge because the sources do not cover the question, it says that the answer goes beyond the course, but I would not claim that it has the same grounding or accuracy guarantee as a source-backed answer. For higher-stakes content, the stricter materials-only mode is the better choice: it stays within the supplied material and acknowledges when the answer is not there. The goal is to make that boundary visible rather than let a fluent answer look more certain than it is.
How does the real-time voice Q&A handle moments when a user asks something that falls outside the content you provided — does it just say it doesn't know, or does it try to improvise?
@zehra6lwq That's an important boundary. PersonWise checks the current slide, the rest of the course, and the uploaded material first. If the default mode answers from general knowledge because the sources do not cover the question, it says that the answer goes beyond the course, but I would not claim that it has the same grounding or accuracy guarantee as a source-backed answer. For higher-stakes content, the stricter materials-only mode is the better choice: it stays within the supplied material and acknowledges when the answer is not there. The goal is to make that boundary visible rather than let a fluent answer look more certain than it is.
The digital-human presenter actually feels natural when you ask it a follow-up, which I didn't expect from something built in 15 minutes. Voice Q&A grounded in my own content is a clever way to keep accuracy tight without sounding robotic.
@englsarpolpe3b Thank you, Şengül. That balance is exactly what I was aiming for: the course can be generated quickly, but the follow-up should still feel conversational while staying grounded in the creator's material instead of improvising from general knowledge. I'm glad that came through. What would you use it for first: internal training, customer education, or interactive content on a website?
The voice Q&A actually understands context from the slides, which caught me off guard. Took my own draft notes and spun up a presentable mini-course faster than I expected.
@muzaffer482690 Thanks, Muzaffer. I'm glad the Q&A stayed connected to your slides and that the draft-to-course workflow felt fast. After trying it with your own notes, what is the first thing you would want to edit or improve before sharing the course with someone else?
The voice Q&A feels surprisingly natural, and I like that I can just drop a link instead of fighting with an embed code. Quick way to turn a rough topic into something people can actually talk to.
@mertcana2lr Thanks, Mertcan. That low-friction sharing path matters to me: a public link should be enough when you just want to send the experience, and the iframe is there when it needs to live inside a site. I'm glad the rough-topic-to-conversation jump came through. What kind of topic would you turn into one first?