just f***ing send it
Send any file, any size, straight from browser to browser
215 followers
Send any file, any size, straight from browser to browser
215 followers
Drop a file, get a short code, share it. The file streams straight from your browser to theirs over an encrypted WebRTC connection — no upload, no server, no account, nothing stored. Multi-GB files and whole folders work, and if the connection drops it can resume.
just f***ing send it
@ykguler good product. Have something like this already exists or you made it first. Like using the WebRTC stuff...
This is clever. Does resume work if the receiver accidentally closes their tab mid-transfer?
just f***ing send it
@dhiraj_patel5 unfortunately no, the progress is kept in memory of the tab.
As a producer I'm forever trying to send multi-GB stem folders to collaborators, and the Drive/Dropbox round-trip is exactly the pain you described. Browser-to-browser WebRTC with folder-as-zip and resume-on-drop fits that use case perfectly — does it hold up over flaky coffee-shop wifi for a 10GB+ transfer, or is LAN where it really shines?
just f***ing send it
@lennoxbeflying connection dropping is not a problem, as long as you don't refresh or close the tab. LAN of course is a better experience due to the sheer bandwidth you can saturate. Coffee-shop you are limited with the bandwidth you get.
browser-to-browser is the right default — but the part nobody shows is transfers behind symmetric nat quietly falling back to a turn relay. that relay's the one bit of 'no server' that isn't.
just f***ing send it
@qifengzheng That silent TURN fallback is exactly the asterisk on most "no server" claims, and you're right that nobody shows it. There is no asterisk except the f***ing part. STUN-only, zero TURN, no relay, not even as an optional fallback. STUN still hole-punches across the internet, so the large majority of transfers genuinely go browser-to-browser even when the two devices aren't on the same network. For the subset where hole-punching can't work (symmetric nat, some cgnat), there is no quiet relay, the transfer fails. There are instructions on the website tell you how to get a direct path.
It is a trade-off, where I choose not to pay for your file transfer.
@ykguler zero turn is the honest version — most 'no server' apps quietly run a relay and call it p2p. where it bites is symmetric-nat / cgnat, hole-punching just fails — what does the user see there instead of an infinite spinner?
just f***ing send it
@qifengzheng First a connection has to be made. So if you can't actually get the connection in place then there is no transfer. In that case there is a small guide on what the users can do to get that connection.
just f***ing send it
@umberto_abbatantuono I used to send files through VLC between my devices. VLC sets up a server but you have to be on the same network. I am not going to go through the hassle of setting up a vpn between devices when its not possible for the two devices to be on the same wifi. As the name suggests I just want to send a file, and the infrastructure is already there; aka the Internet, so don't really need to install an app for it also..
Voquill
The name is hard to ignore 😄Are there any practical limits on file size or transfer speed, but this looks really useful. Congrats!
just f***ing send it
@henry_habib Thanks! I've tested it up to 20GB over the Internet (not on the same LAN). But if you have a 132GB uncompressed 3D video file give it a go. For a select few that don't get the reference:
The STUN-only approach is actually pretty cool.
Most tools saying "peer-to-peer" end up relaying traffic through their own servers when things get complicated.
Have you seen many transfers fail because of NAT restrictions?
Congrats on the launch!