Hi everyone — I’m the maker of Agora. I built Agora because I kept feeling that complex tasks shouldn’t always be handled by one model in one pass. For research-heavy or execution-heavy work, I wanted a workflow where different AI roles could contribute different perspectives before anything gets done. So in Agora: * a moderator routes the task * a scout gathers outside information * an architect proposes solutions * a critic challenges risks and assumptions * a synthesizer turns the discussion into action items * and an executor carries out approved actions and generates artifacts It’s still early, but the core workflow is already there: discussion, execution, and artifacts in one interface. I’d especially love feedback on two things: 1. In what kinds of tasks do you think multi-agent discussion is genuinely better than a single strong model? 2. What would make a system like this actually useful in real daily work? Thanks for checking it out — happy to answer questions and would love your feedback.

Agora

Open-source multi-agent council for research and execution

Open-source multi-agent council for research and execution