Direbase
Check if AI search can actually read and cite your site
4 followers
Check if AI search can actually read and cite your site
4 followers
Most "AI SEO" tools just parse robots.txt. Direbase requests your page with the real crawler user-agents (OAI-SearchBot, PerplexityBot, Claude-SearchBot) to catch WAF blocks you can't see in a browser, and flags content that only exists after JavaScript runs. It scores direct answers, structured data and E-E-A-T, and generates the fix code. New: an MCP server for Claude Code and Cursor. Your AI runs the check, lists the fixes, and applies only the ones you pick. Free plan available.
This is the 2nd launch from Direbase. View more
Direbase
Launching today
Direbase now runs inside your AI coding agent. Connect it to Claude Code or Cursor over MCP and ask it to check a URL. You get the overall SEO or AI-search score, a numbered list of what costs points, and a choice: fix all, pick some, or skip. Your agent shows its plan and edits your code only after you approve. Under the hood: real AI-crawler requests that catch WAF blocks, JS-only content detection, and fix code. Free plan available.
Free Options
Launch Team
Render Sandboxes: a computer for every agentIsolated compute, persistent state and a real filesystem
Promoted
Hi Product Hunt. I launched Direbase here in August as a check for whether AI search can actually read and cite your site.
A report is only half the job, though. Someone still has to turn the list into code changes. So Direbase now has an MCP server.
Connect it once with an API key (the free plan works), open your site's folder in Claude Code or Cursor, and ask it to check a URL. Your agent gets:
the overall score first
a numbered list of what costs points, biggest loss first
a choice: fix all, pick the ones you want, or leave it
For SEO items it fetches fix code only for what you picked. AI-search results already carry a code snippet per item.
One rule is written into the server's instructions on purpose: the agent has to show you which file it will change, and where, and wait for your OK before editing anything. It never publishes on its own. I would not let a tool silently rewrite a client's templates, so I didn't build one.
It only checks public URLs (not localhost), and the analyzed page's text is passed to the agent as data, not instructions.
The free plan is 3 checks a month. I'd like to hear what your agent does with it, especially if it picks a fix you disagree with.