I'm a designer who has run small sites for years, and I built Site Checkups because the honest read of my own homepages was the thing I could never get quickly.

It's an AI tool, and I wanted it to behave like one. It does the reading and the drafting: what a stranger sees in the first few seconds, the doubts that make them leave, and, in the $19 Growth Plan, the rewritten headline, buttons and FAQ, written for your site builder. It also reads a few of your own pages (pricing, policies, about) so it doesn't invent facts.

What it can't know is your business. So every finding has a "Doesn't fit?" link. Set it aside, say why if you like ("we quote every project"), and it stays on the page, marked, while your next plan and re-check stop repeating it. When the same advice keeps missing for lots of people, I read those marks and write a lesson the reviewer follows for everyone. Nothing anyone types changes someone else's report on its own.

Three of my own sites are torn down in public at sitecheckups.com/teardowns, the reports exactly as the AI wrote them. I'd love blunt feedback, especially on findings you'd set aside.

I'm a designer who has run small sites for years, and I built Site Checkups because the honest read of my own homepages was the thing I could never get quickly.

Three of my own sites are torn down in public at sitecheckups.com/teardowns, the reports exactly as the AI wrote them. I'd love blunt feedback, especially on findings you'd set aside.

Site Checkups

A homepage review from an AI that expects you to argue

A homepage review from an AI that expects you to argue