EU AI Act compliance platform: classify high-risk AI systems, generate Annex IV technical documentation, and track GDPR, NIS2, and Data Act requirements.

Hi everyone — I'm Antonino, based in Treviso. I run an advisory firm and I'm the commercial partner on LandingRed. This product comes out of a scene I've watched repeat in client meetings for two years. An AI Act questionnaire in one spreadsheet. A GDPR register in another. A NIS2 checklist a consultant left behind. A DORA gap analysis in a PDF someone emailed in March. Seven regulations, seven tools, and usually one person handling all of it on top of a full-time job that has nothing to do with compliance. The thing that finally bothered me enough to do something about it: most of that is the same work, done repeatedly. Access control, logging, incident response, supplier due diligence — the same underlying obligations show up across frameworks with different article numbers attached. So LandingRed is built on a single obligation model. Map a control once and it satisfies its equivalents everywhere else, with an audit trail on every assessment and approval. For the AI Act specifically: Annex III and Article 6 classification with reasoning you can defend to an auditor, Annex IV technical documentation generated from your real system inventory rather than a blank template, and FRIA linked to the GDPR controls your DPO already maintains. Built in Europe, for companies carrying the same obligations as large enterprises without a twelve-person compliance department. What I'd most like to hear: if you've been through an AI Act classification, how did your auditor or your client actually push back on it? That's the part we've reworked most and I'd like to know where it still falls short. My co-founder handles the technical side and will be in the thread too — ask us anything, including the skeptical questions.

LandingRed

EU AI Act compliance platform for SMEs.

EU AI Act compliance platform for SMEs.