We all know that websites need to be read by agents nowadays. But how do they actually see and understand a website? Is Agentic scans a public URL and scores what an agent can actually do there: server-rendered content, sane HTTP behavior, document structure, recoverable errors, usable controls. Checks that don't apply to your site get excluded instead of counted against you, which makes total sense. Two things I liked. First, every finding ships with the evidence from the scan plus a concrete recommendation you can hand straight to Claude Code or Antigravity. Second, the reports practice what they preach — same URL returns HTML to a browser, Markdown to an agent that asks for it, JSON via the API, and there's an MCP server for the whole thing. None of the machine interfaces need a credential. There's also an "observed agent journey" in each report showing where one agent actually got stuck. It's supporting evidence, not part of the score, which is the honest call. Fair warning: some big names are scoring in the 30s and 50s. Go check your own site before someone else does.

Is Agentic

Score how agentic your site is

Score how agentic your site is