Launched this week
Finola helps finance professionals build structured AI workflows instead of relying on one-off prompts. Organize prompts, chain reasoning frameworks, validation rules and reporting templates into reusable workflows that improve accuracy, consistency and reduce AI hallucinations.
Over the last two years, I've watched finance professionals adopt AI at an incredible pace.
But I kept seeing the same problem.
People weren't struggling to write prompts—they were struggling to manage them.
Research workflows became scattered across ChatGPT conversations, Notion pages, Word documents, Claude projects and random text files. Important reasoning steps were forgotten, validation prompts were skipped, and AI would frequently hallucinate or ignore instructions.
In finance, those mistakes aren't just annoying—they can become expensive.
So I built Finola.
Instead of treating prompts as one-off conversations, Finola lets you build structured AI workflows.
Inside Finola you can:
✅ Organize hundreds of prompts into a searchable library
✅ Build multi-step workflows using modular prompts
✅ Combine reasoning frameworks, validation rules and reporting styles
✅ Save reusable workflows for every client or recurring task
✅ Generate production-ready prompts for ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, Perplexity and other AI models
It also includes a growing library of finance-specific prompt modules covering:
• Institutional Equity Research
• Due Diligence
• Portfolio Management
• Client Advisory
...with many more coming soon.
My goal wasn't to build another AI chat application.
I wanted to build the operating system that sits behind AI—helping finance professionals produce more reliable, repeatable and auditable work.
I'd genuinely love your feedback, ideas and criticism.
Thanks for checking out Finola!
@chris_b8 Congratulations on the launch. I gave Finola an upvote because the problem you're solving is one I've seen firsthand as AI becomes part of daily work, and bringing structure to repeatable workflows makes a lot of sense. I'm curious, how do you version and track changes to prompt workflows without disrupting existing processes?
Have you thought about adding a diff view between workflow versions, so teams can see exactly what changed when someone updates a prompt or validation rule. Would make auditing much smoother and help catch accidental regressions before they hit production reports.
@gulhanmana21499 No, the collaborative features have not been our primary focus, thank you for bringing that idea to forefront.
Would love to see a built-in audit log that tracks every input, prompt version and output for a given workflow run, so we can trace exactly where a hallucinated number slipped in during a client deliverable.
Saved me a ton of time chaining valuation prompts together the validation rules alone cut my rework in half really impressed
@sadk375060 Thanks!!
Honestly the chaining of reasoning frameworks is pretty slick, saved me from rebuilding the same prompt structure every week