Launching today
Reality Filter
Is that AI launch real, or just hype?
16 followers
Is that AI launch real, or just hype?
16 followers
Every AI launch sounds revolutionary. Reality Filter cuts through it — paste any AI launch and get a straight verdict: worth trying now, watch later, too early, or mostly fog machine. Every verdict comes with real evidence: what's proven, what's missing, what named experts and real users actually say — not just the press release. Verdicts are dated and kept public, so if a call ages badly, it's on record. Free, no signup needed to see a verdict.
Love the dated public verdicts idea, that accountability hook is great. One thing that would really help me trust the calls more: add a quick confidence score next to each verdict, like a 1-5 rating based on how much real evidence you actually found. If a verdict is mostly fog machine but only because the launch was three hours old and barely anyone has tested it yet, I want to know that. It would help me tell the difference between "this genuinely looks weak" and "we just don't have enough signal yet."
@azat862271 Thanks Azat! You nailed exactly what I want to fix. Right now the label doesn't show how much evidence is actually behind it — a "mostly fog" call could mean the product is genuinely weak, OR just too new to judge. A 1-5 confidence score would make that clear. Adding it to my list for the next version
Would love a way to submit counter-evidence or corrections directly on a verdict page, kind of like a comment thread tied to specific claims. That way if an early "too early" call gets disproven by new benchmarks, the community can flag it and the record stays accurate instead of relying only on the team's own updates.
@cemreozome60888 Great point Cemre! Keeping the record accurate over time is the whole goal. I actually already re-check and re-date verdicts — GPT-5.6 went from "too early" to "worth trying" once it hit GA, and the old call stays on record. Letting people submit evidence is an interesting next step; the tricky part is keeping it trustworthy and spam-free, but the need is real. Really appreciate this
Pasted in a launch I was skeptical about and the verdict nailed it, citing a real benchmark study I hadn't seen. Love that the call is timestamped and on record.
@zkancpwj Thank you for your feedback, sir!
The public dated verdicts thing is genuinely clever — most AI review tools just give you a snapshot and move on, so having receipts on whether a call ages well or poorly is kind of a gutsy move. Honestly respect that.
@kadirk23625 Thanks bro
Finally got honest pushback on something I was hyped about. The "watch later" verdict came with actual gaps in the evidence listed out, which is way more useful than another take telling me to drop everything and try it.
Pasted in a launch I'd been waffling on and the verdict flagged two claims the post never backed up, with links to actual testers weighing in. Genuinely useful for cutting through the noise without needing another login.