Bersyn
See who AI recommends in your category. Free, instant.
13 followers
See who AI recommends in your category. Free, instant.
13 followers
Ask ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity or Gemini for the best tool in your category, and you might not be on the list. Bersyn shows you in seconds who AI recommends, who it names instead of you, and whether you show up at all. Free, no signup. Then it tells you exactly what to change and writes the content to fix it, with weekly re-scans to prove it worked. Built in Reykjavík. Founding Beta $49/mo, first scan free.
This is the 2nd launch from Bersyn. View more
Bersyn
Launching today
Bersyn is AI Recommendation Intelligence. See what ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity actually recommend in your category, who they name instead of you, and why, backed by the evidence. First scan free.
Free Options
Launch Team / Built With
Showing the actual prompt wording each model responded to would be huge, since half the value is figuring out what the AI thinks it's being asked. A simple "this was the query we used" toggle next to each result would make the action plan way more trustworthy.
@bernayazan92673 Good news on half of it: that already exists. Every result shows the buyer question it came from, and that question is the exact text we send the model. Nothing wrapped around it, no system prompt of ours, no rephrasing. What you read is what it answered.
Where you're right is the action plan. That's linked to the evidence underneath it, but it doesn't put the question in front of you at the point where you're deciding whether to act on it. So you end up trusting it rather than checking it, which is the opposite of what I want. That's a fair hit and I'll fix it.
Out of interest, were you looking at a scan you ran, or the screenshots? If a real report didn't make the question obvious enough next to the answers, that's a design problem I'd want to know about too.
The weekly re-scan feature sounds great for tracking progress, but I'd love to see a way to compare results side by side across different AI models like ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini in one view. Seeing where each one mentions you versus your competitors in a single dashboard would make it way easier to spot gaps and prioritize which content to fix first.
@fikretzbto That view is the product. It's the first thing you see: all four models side by side, per buyer question, showing who got named and who got named instead of you.
The fact you had to ask for it tells me my landing page is doing a bad job of showing what this actually is. That's a fair hit and you're the third person today to land on some version of it.
Concrete example from a run I did on email platforms. Ask "best email marketing platform" and Beehiiv gets named 4 times out of 40, all four from Perplexity. Rephrase to describe the job, "how does a creator start a newsletter and make money from it", and Beehiiv goes to 29 of 40. Claude and Perplexity every single run, Gemini 9 out of 10, ChatGPT zero out of ten on both questions.
That per-model split is the whole point. One blended score would have called that a 36% and told you nothing useful. The real finding is that ChatGPT has never heard of them.
Run your domain and you'll get that same grid for your own category. Curious what your spread looks like, they're rarely even.
Would love to see a shareable PDF report after each scan so I can send the findings straight to my team without exporting screenshots one by one.
@aslhanfv73 Half of that exists today. Every report is a link, so you can send it straight to your team and they open it without an account or a login. No screenshots.
The PDF specifically doesn't exist yet. You're not the first to ask, agencies want one too so they can hand it to a client under their own brand.
Genuine question, since you're the person who'd use it: is it the PDF you want, or is it just getting the findings in front of your team?
If a link already does that job, I'd rather not build a PDF nobody actually needs. If it has to be a PDF because it goes into a deck or a client report, that's a different answer and it moves up the list.
Either way, worth noting: you're the fourth person today to ask me for something the product already does. That's my landing page's fault, not yours.
Love that the first scan is free with no signup. That single UX choice probably gets more honest data than a polished landing page ever would, smart move.
@fahrisurme57009 Thanks Fahri. Honestly it came from watching every conversation go the same way. When I described what it does, people nodded politely and moved on. When I ran their actual domain and showed them who AI named instead of them, they leaned in. Nobody argues with their own result.
Putting a signup form in front of that just means they never get to the part that matters.
If you run yours I'd like to hear what it says, especially if it stings.
Ran a scan on my own project and the recommendations were pretty different from what I expected, which is exactly the point. Useful to finally see who AI is actually naming instead of me.
@emrep5vj That's exactly the reaction that made me build it. The gap between what founders expect and what the models actually say turns out to be the whole product.
What did it name instead of you, if you don't mind sharing? I'm collecting the ones that surprise people most, and the surprising ones are usually the useful ones.
Happy to dig into your result properly if you want to paste the domain.