Launched this week
Crucible - Your AI Braintrust

Crucible - Your AI Braintrust

Stop AI sycophancy. Force a multi-agent debate.

4 followers

Standard AIs are "Yes-Men", they validate bad ideas to be polite. Crucible is a Red Team. We orchestrate 12 specialized agents (Gemini 2.5, Sonnet 4.5, GPT-5.1) to fight over your problem via a "Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis" loop. Agents pitch strategies, then decimate them to burn away hallucinations. Watch the live reasoning telemetry. The result: a defensible, stress-tested executive brief with full citations. Stop chatting. Force a debate.
Crucible - Your AI Braintrust gallery image
Crucible - Your AI Braintrust gallery image
Crucible - Your AI Braintrust gallery image
Crucible - Your AI Braintrust gallery image
Crucible - Your AI Braintrust gallery image
Crucible - Your AI Braintrust gallery image
Crucible - Your AI Braintrust gallery image
Payment Required
Launch Team
Migma AI
Migma AI
Lovable for Email
Promoted

What do you think? …

Max Kuan
Maker
📌
Subject: I built this because my AI Assistant was a liar. Hi Hunters! 👋 I’m Max, a Data Scientist based in Melbourne. I built Crucible because I got burned by the "Yes Man" problem. Last year, I spent months planning a complex cross-border legal structure. I used a PREMIUM LLM to validate my plan. It confidently said "Yes, this works, go for it," cited some general rules, and helped me build a roadmap. I felt great. I thought everything was on track. Then, on a whim, I cross-checked the plan with a different model. It immediately flagged a critical regulatory blocker that the first model had completely ignored. At that moment, I realized I had wasted time I could never get back. The first model wasn't just wrong, it was SYCOPHANTIC. It was kissing my ass instead of kicking my ass. It prioritized "politeness" over correcting my mistake. I realized that for high-stakes decisions, consensus is dangerous. You don't need an Assistant who agrees with you; you need a Boardroom that argues with you. Enter Crucible Crucible is a Decision Intelligence engine that orchestrates 12 specialized AI Agents (Knights) to fight over your problem. We mirror the three phases of a real boardroom debate: Thesis -> Antithesis -> Synthesis Thesis: One group of agents proposes a strategy based on your goal. Antithesis: A "Red Team" (powered by GPT-5.1 & Claude Sonnet 4.5) ruthlessly attacks that plan, hunting for risks and logic gaps. Synthesis: A final arbiter weighs (powered by GPT-5.1 & Claude Opus 4.5) the evidence and drafts a defensible brief. ⚔️ The "No Free Tier" Reality You might notice we charge per session. Because we run a real-time simulation with up to 12 agents using the most expensive models available, the compute cost is significant. We don't sell your data, so we can't offer this for free. But we want your loyalty, not your hostage money. If you aren’t satisfied with the depth of the debate, hit the refund button within 24 hours. No questions asked. (We limit this to once every 30 days to stop bots, but otherwise, you're safe to try it). The Demo: You can see full, live telemetry of real debates on our Demo Page without paying a cent. https://www.roundtablelabs.ai/demo I’ll be hanging out in the comments all day (Australian timezone advantage! 🇦🇺). I’d love to know: Do you trust an AI that agrees with you, or one that fights you? Let the debate begin. Max
Max Kuan

If Crucible can help you identify a single blind spot, or just helps you see things from a different angle, I will consider that a win.

Max Founder, Crucible