I dont see how this is any different from any other bad logo generator.. sorry.. same principle; type in name, select stuff you like and get crappy recommendations that are far off what you picked. 70% of the logos are just different fonts, and 20% are different fonts with the first letter above, 5% with an icon before logo and 5% with some random art/shapes…See more
@lasserafn appreciate your input. We're definitely early and aware of our limitations. Let me try and explain why we think we're better than the other guys re: the issues you mentioned:
1. Crappy recommendations - We show you unlimited recommendations, and get smarter as you favorite certain ones. Other logo makers only show you a limited amount and do not …See more
@dawson_whitfield Dont take this the wrong way, it's not like Im saying that your product is bad, it's just that it's.. pretty much the same results that all other services provide (and similar results the more results you load)
1. They may not be crappy.. but when I go through a flow that should make the results returned fit my personal style, I think it w…See more
@dawson_whitfield Again, please do not misunderstand me. The site is nice and product, but I think that the generation of logos needs some work, or maybe it's just me whos in the wrong..
Video of one of my tests:
Again, I added a few to favourites, they were quite nice (And I could probably imagine using them; they're pretty close to the current) and I d…See more
@lasserafn Thank you so much for the explanation and video - this is why I love PH.
I agree the results are varied. The algorithm has a long way to go. A lot of people I've talked to use the initial 'generator' stage for inspiration, and then spend most of their time fine-tuning logos. We are planning on adding more layout variations to this step, so the lo…See more
